Here is the beginning of the opening chapter of Rebooting the Bible, Part 2. I am still striving to have the book finished by May 1. It looks like it won’t be available until about May 15 or so. Between now and then, I will begin sharing some of the new book to give you insight into where its going. I hope this meets with your approval and generates interest. Do let me know! You can respond on my Facebook page or by emailing me at firstname.lastname@example.org. Blessings during this crazy time in which we live.
“We conclude that the … Read More
I CONTINUE TO WORK DILIGENTLY. And I’m making steady progress toward completing the book. My goal is to have it in the market and available for purchase May 1.
I will continue to publish bits and pieces of what’s coming. For now, here is the Front Cover. Let me know what you think. It’s meant to complement RTB Part 1 and visually demonstrate that the content has been published in two parts and is vitally related.
If you haven’t purchased Rebooting the Bible, Part 1, Its now a good time to do so. Pay 12% off the retail price ($19.95 … Read More
I’m hard at work. I’ve completed 5 chapters (all of them 15,000 words or better) and have 2 more to go. Plus an introduction and recap of Part 1 of RTB.
I thought those who follow me might appreciate a taste of what is to come. I expect to be done by the end of March with a release date about May the 1st (some promotional work will be done in April).
ITS TIME TO BUY AND READ REBOOTING THE BIBLE, PART ONE, IF YOU HAVEN’T ALREADY. AND GET A COPY OF A BIOGRAPHY OF THE CHRISTIAN BIBLE FREE! … Read More
More Than the Antichrist Archetype?
One of the most intriguing characters in the Old Testament is Nimrod, son of Cush, and grandson of Ham. His name often comes up as the archetype of the Antichrist. It turns out that when we dig into the story surrounding Nimrod, there is much more to be said about his importance than just the speculation that he might be figure who arises again in the last days (“who was, is not, but will be again” – Revelation 17:8) as the Antichrist.
Most of you who read this follow me regularly. You are aware that … Read More
Perhaps the most incredible argument against the historical validity of the Septuagint (as a third-to-second-century-B.C. creation) is this: It was fabricated, following rather than preceding the composition of the New Testament (NT). It’s a heated area of debate because the King-James-only argument stands or falls based on when the LXX translation was commenced and completed. A valid LXX puts the King James Version at odds with itself, i.e., the two KJV Testaments really don’t agree with one another!
[The following is drawn from an Appendix to A BIOGRAPHY OF THE CHRISTIAN BIBLE.]
A typical unfavorable argument (against the Septuagint, LXX, … Read More